Comments for The Great Game

Comment on Round 27 by David Argall

David Argall — Sat, 06 Mar 2010 08:06:30 +0000

We certainly seem to have something worth reporting here, and that makes retreat a reasonable idea. And it does seem possibly less dangerous.

Comment on Round 26 by Ghostwoods

Ghostwoods — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 22:24:17 +0000

It’s good to know that at least someone got the reference But to answer the question, no, not precisely…

Comment on Round 26 by David Argall

David Argall — Wed, 03 Mar 2010 07:18:51 +0000

It really seems the answer is none of the above.

But are we now in Shadow?

Comment on Round 24 by salomejones

salomejones — Fri, 26 Feb 2010 03:10:54 +0000

Huzzah!

Comment on Round 23 by salomejones

salomejones — Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:31:47 +0000

I’m shocked! Shocked at this vote. That is all.

Comment on Round 22 by Ghostwoods

Ghostwoods — Fri, 19 Feb 2010 22:45:05 +0000

It’s not totally simple to tell, because this is a sub-site off my blog’s Ghostwoods domain, with causes a certain amount of static with my Analytics.

However, having said that, It looks as if between 1/3 and 1/4 of readers vote, which would put the number of readers somewhere in the region of 100 on average!

Comment on Round 22 by David Argall

David Argall — Wed, 17 Feb 2010 09:01:42 +0000

A little math suggests that 19 have voted when I looked in, and presumably more will, not to mention those who view and don’t vote. So the total audience likely beats 3 figures anyway.

Comment on Round 22 by Utisz

Utisz — Tue, 16 Feb 2010 03:13:42 +0000

Okay, how many people are reading this, decidedly fine, series? ’cause it’s starting to be weird how often I’m the first person to find an update.

Comment on Round 21 by salomejones

salomejones — Fri, 12 Feb 2010 14:26:59 +0000

Of course, whatever Taylor says, it’s just to buy some time. We all know what REALLY happened, don’t we? But perhaps the sort of discrepancies that could be found in Overlook would be ones that only a human could detect. It really should keep them busy for a while trying to find them, even if (or maybe especially if) there aren’t any discrepancies. I suggest an advertisement of some sort–whatever the equivalent of a classified ad might be–asking for people who actually ate at that gyros restaurant two or three months ago….

Comment on Round 21 by Rip

Rip — Fri, 12 Feb 2010 09:44:11 +0000

Given the total trust all characters seem to place in Overlook, I doubt they’ll be open to the idea of Overlook being wrong (at least, not without hard evidence). But if Overlook has been hacked, City Planning is a bit too obvious – if they’ve gone to the trouble of hacking Overlook, they’ve probably altered the city planning records too.

A Food Standards agency or Health and Safety board on the other hand could have flown under the radar… So I’m going with licenses or inspections for the Gyros restaurant .